'The Definition of Food “What things are called is unspeakably more important than what they are.” –Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science If you asked someone to define “food” they would return something like this: “Any nutritious substance that people or animals eat or drink, or that plants absorb, in order to maintain life and growth” Wrong. Food is actually: Any singular substance that we can subsist on indefinitely, while building or maintaining enough muscle mass for rigorous strength training, without developing any illness, chronic disease, or nutritional deficiency. The question is, can you survive and thrive on this product–and this product alone? The only thing that fits this definition is a cow. Not broccoli. Not rice. Not soybeans. Only cows–nose to tail–fit the bill. Can we eat things that aren\'t food? Certainly. Can we combine things that aren\'t food and eat them in order to achieve the same goals? If we\'re smart. But if you remember this one fact, you\'ll never lose your way: if it ain\'t meat, it ain\'t a meal.
Tags: Food , calories , keto , carnivore , vegan , posture , paleo , veganism , MEAT , spirituality , Intestines , What is Nutrition , Vegan Debate , vegan myths debunked , debunk vegan myths , nutritional philosophy , vegans get owned , debunking veganism , diet cult , nutrition cult , dietary cult , philosophy of nutrition , dietary philosophy , philosophy of life , philosophy for life , context , realistic goals , nutrition for life , dietary epistemology , middlebrow , are humans herbivores , vegan myth , Vegan myths
See also:
comments